Ensuring ED Cannot Place Restrictions on PSLF Eligibility

Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights, the American Immigration Council, The Door — A Center of Alternatives, Inc., and the League of United Latin American Citizens Institute, Inc., v. the U.S. Department of Education

Update:

On June 30, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia deemed the rule unlawful. The ruling states, “the challenged rule is contrary to and exceeds the Secretary’s authority under the Higher Education Act … the court must vacate the rule.”

Background:

On November 4, 2025, Student Defense and Public Citizen filed a lawsuit challenging a new rule issued by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) that threatens to disqualify certain employers from eligibility for the federal Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program.

The case was filed on behalf of Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights, the American Immigration Council, The Door — A Center of Alternatives, Inc., and the League of United Latin American Citizens Institute, Inc.

ED established the new rule in response to an Executive Order issued by President Donald Trump. Finalized on October 31, the rule allows ED to disqualify employers from the PSLF program that are deemed to have a “substantial illegal purpose” by the Secretary of Education. Under the rule, ED will decide for itself whether this standard is met, based on its unilateral determination that an organization has engaged in activities disfavored by the administration concerning immigration, gender affirming care, and purported discrimination, along with other areas. The rule’s vague and over-broad language permits arbitrary enforcement against mission-driven organizations doing work or expressing opinions opposed by the government.

PSLF was created in 2007 to encourage students to pursue public service careers after graduation. The program offers federal student loan forgiveness to those who spend ten years repaying such loans while working full time in a public service job. The statute creating the program provides a clear list of qualifying employers, which include military service, emergency management, public health, government, public safety, law enforcement, early childhood education and library science, and all 501(c)(3) organizations, among others.

We want to ensure the government keeps its promise to the millions of public servants in this country: if they give back to the country, the country will give back to them.

The press release issued after this case was filed is available here.

News Coverage:

Student Loan Forgiveness Is Safe For Now After Two Big Court Losses For Trump Administration | July 1, 2026 | Forbes

Trump Public Loan Forgiveness Rule Is Unlawful, Judges Find | June 30, 2026 | Law360

Judges strike down Trump administration’s overhaul of student loan forgiveness | June 30, 2026 | AP

U.S. Judges Block Trump’s Limits on Student Loan Forgiveness Program | June 30, 2026 | Reuters

Education Department sued over controversial loan forgiveness rule | November 3, 2025 | POLITICO

States and cities challenge Trump policy overhauling public service loan forgiveness | November 3, 2025 | AP

Case Documents:

Final ruling (June 30, 2026)

Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Cross Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Apr. 20, 2026)

Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, and Opposition to Defendants’ Cross-Motion to Dismiss (March 30, 2026)

Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (March 9, 2026)

Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (February 9, 2026)

Complaint (November 4, 2025)

Previous
Previous

Student Defense Statement on the Trump Administration’s Latest Efforts to Dismantle ED By Moving Its Offices To Other Federal Departments

Next
Next

Lawsuit Challenges the Department of Education Over New Public Service Loan Forgiveness Rule